Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa BG 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Daiwa BG
Spinning
75.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/190
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 2500X edges out Daiwa TD FEEDER QD with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (265g / 9,35oz) and the durability (7.74 out of 10). Still, Daiwa TD FEEDER QD holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 8kg and a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Daiwa BG?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- With a maximum drag of 9.6 out of 10 (8kg), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Daiwa BG 2500X
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
