Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TD FEEDER QD offers a ball bearings of 6, while Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X stands out for a durability of 8.59 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
