Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
85.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €579.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 140/0.14
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 1000X clearly outshines Daiwa TD FEEDER QD, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (170g / 6oz). While Daiwa TD FEEDER QD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Shimano Stella FK 1000X
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
