Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85
Conclusion
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG clearly outshines Daiwa TD FEEDER QD, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (215g / 7,58oz). While Daiwa TD FEEDER QD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
