Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX edges out Daiwa TD FEEDER QD with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (180g / 6,35oz) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa TD FEEDER QD holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 8kg and a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X
