Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX edges out Daiwa TD FEEDER QD with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the weight (220g / 7,76oz). Still, Daiwa TD FEEDER QD holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 4.9:1 and a maximum drag of 8kg, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
