Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €419.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX clearly outshines Daiwa TD FEEDER QD, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (205g / 7,23oz). While Daiwa TD FEEDER QD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin RAYA body vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX
