Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €419.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX clearly outshines Daiwa TD FEEDER QD, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (205g / 7,23oz). While Daiwa TD FEEDER QD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
