Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
64.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa TD Match 4012X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and weight (230g / 8,11oz). While Daiwa TD Match 4012X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD Match and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
