Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
64.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TD Match 4012X and Penn FIERCE IV 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TD Match 4012X offers a line retrieve per crank of 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch, while Penn FIERCE IV 2000X stands out for a maximum drag of 4,5kg / 9,92lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD Match and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X
