Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.04 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX
