Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500

Multireels

70.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio2.8:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight750g / 26.46oz

Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €489.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT

Spinning

81.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.6 out of 10

Ergonomics6.45 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight165g / 5.82oz

Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €181.70
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil-

Conclusion

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (165g / 5,82oz) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX

The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
With a score like 8.9 out of 10 (165g / 5,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency