Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
