Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (210g / 7,41oz). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
