Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
