Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
