Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
64.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €86.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 92 centimeter / 36.22 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- 8.7 out of 10 (92 centimeter / 36.22 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX
