Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 20 Luvias LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
94.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €379.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in weight (180g / 6,35oz) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 20 Luvias LT?
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X
