Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (300g / 10,58oz) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
