Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX
