Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
