Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
