Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX
