Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in weight (200g / 7,05oz) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
