Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and weight (170g / 6oz). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X
