Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
