Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
