Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €143.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the weight (245g / 8,64oz). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 23 LEXA LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX
