Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN
Spinning
54.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.02 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight295g / 10.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/200
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.04 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a weight of 295g / 10,41oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.03 out of 10 (295g / 10,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X
