Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
64.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
