Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.04 out of 10). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
