Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 2000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Delphin CarbonIX 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Delphin CarbonIX?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX
