Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin HORNET 50X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Delphin HORNET?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Delphin HORNET 50X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X
