Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
60.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight246g / 8.68oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/350
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Delphin IXTREK 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Delphin IXTREK 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6+1 and a weight of 246g / 8,68oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Delphin IXTREK?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Delphin IXTREK 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.36 out of 10 (246g / 8,68oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X
