Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
59.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight289g / 10.19oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €43.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Delphin IXTREK 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Delphin IXTREK 4000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6+1 and a weight of 289g / 10,19oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Delphin IXTREK?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Delphin IXTREK 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (289g / 10,19oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
