Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8.11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
