Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.04 out of 10). Still, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin YUPIE


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
