Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Battle III 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Penn Battle III
Spinning
72.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.73 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Penn Battle III 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Penn Battle III 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
