Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Battle III 6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Penn Battle III 6000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Penn Battle III 6000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A high retrieve rate of 9.9 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
