Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Penn FIERCE IV 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Penn FIERCE IV 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX
