Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
65.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Penn FIERCE IV 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Penn FIERCE IV 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
