Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a ball bearings of 7, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR
