Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a ball bearings of 7, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
