Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
54.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.91 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.04 out of 10). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
