Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano AERO XR C5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C5000X stands out for a ball bearings of 5+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano AERO XR?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Delphin RAYA body
