Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.04 out of 10). Still, Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.8:1 and a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Catana FE?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR
