Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.04 out of 10). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Catana FE?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
