Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500X edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (175g / 6,17oz) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Complex XR?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
