Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Shimano FX 4000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.04 out of 10). While Shimano FX 4000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano FX?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
