Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 105 centimeter / 41.34 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A high retrieve rate of 10 out of 10 (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
